Martin Wilson uses every day objects and letters he finds around in the streets of London to create messages. Nothing too special about this you might suggest about this and if this were the only thing he does then that would be correct. However, Wilson uses film as his medium to record the letters. He then places the stripes of 35 mm film together to spell out the message. Again on the face of it not too unusual until you start to realise that he must work out what each frame of film must contain before he captures it.
If this was not daunting enough then consider the piece 'New Life' above. Here Wilson has used branches of trees to spell out the saying 'I was naked, you clothed me'. Each letter was made up of at least four frames. Not only that but each branch must be framed in such a way as to ensure that it fits together with the other frames that make up each character. Once you start to get your head around that then you realise what a monumental task it is to create each work. Just to complicate matters ', you clothed me' can only be taken in spring when the new leaves are just coming into bud. Mess that up and you have to wait another twelve months to get it right. To see this in greater detail
click here.
Now this would be very easy to do using Photoshop but with film it becomes a monumental effort. You only have to think about the attention to detail that must be applied to the planning of each piece and your head starts to spin.
However, this was not caused the revaluation in me. The question that kept coming back to me was this - is this photography? Now I know that this is one of those questions that you can never answer. It is up there with - is this art? On one level it is photography. All of the pieces exhibited are literally photographs. However, this is like saying a painting is just oil on canvas. It is true but doesn't really mean anything. I think an indication of what Wilson thinks comes from the statement accompanying the exhibition. Here Wilson is described as creating '...photographic artworks...' So Wilson thinks that they are primarily photographs. It is just to me this doesn't really do the work justice - it really seems to have that hybrid nature - perhaps a missing link between the two worlds - this of course assumes that there is any delineation between art and photography.
I don't really have any answer to these questions and in the end I don't think it matters but standing in front of the pieces it just kept recuring in my head and that is surely what good art should do. It should challange you to think again and reexamine your perceptions and provide new inspirations. Martin Wilson's work certainly did this for me.
So if you get the chance to see Martin Wilson's work then it really is worth it.